I wrote my paper and when submitting it the similarity score came back 48%. Although the sources it cited was not a place where I got my information….

Question Answered step-by-step I wrote my paper and when submitting it the similarity score cameback 48%. Although the sources it cited was not a place where I got my information.  Can you assist in helping me lesson the score because everyone is writing about the same discussion board. Here is my paper although I did check through grammatically it said zero. Here are the guidelines for my discussion board : Overtime Americans have lost trust in government. In 1958, in the era of Eisenhower and Kennedy, about 75% of Americans trusted the federal government to do the right thing most of the time. By 2019, that number among Republicans had dropped to 21%. It also dropped among Democrats to 14% (Rainie & Perrin, 2019).The 1970’s were a time when trust in government was falling. Vietnam divided the country. In 1974, Richard Nixon became the first American president to resign the office. The Watergate story revealed widespread corruption in his administration.Watch this video summary of the Watergate scandal.            https://youtu.be/tqBRkVWhea0Nixon was facing impeachment and removal from office. He instead chose to step down. Since then public trust in government has continued to drop.  This is especially true for the executive and legislative branches. Watch this video that examines trust in government since 1958.      https://youtu.be/N-FRQDC24RsThink about the impact of Watergate and Vietnam on public trust in institutions such as government.  Choose ONE event that is discussed in the video and answer the following questions:  -Why do think this event had the impact it did on public trust in public institutions like the government? -How might trust in public institutions, especially government, be regained?  The Watergate shock was one of the most discernibly horrendous political humiliations in American history. It occurred in the passive consent of the president, Richard M. Nixon, under risk of upbraiding and the conviction of a couple of high-situating people from his association. Watergate took its name from the break-in at the Democratic National Committee (DNC) headquarters in the Watergate space and office complex in Washington, D.C., in June 1972. Yet, the humiliation spread as other criminal tasks were unveiled. This shame continued until the pre-summer of 1974, when Nixon left office.The activities that would fall under “Watergate” began every step of the way in the Nixon association. In 1969, Nixon upheld wiretaps on the phones of government specialists and columnists attempting to perceive the wellspring of data spills about practices in Vietnam. In 1971 an excellent assessments unit was outlined to plug news spills. Named the “jacks of all trades,” they broke into the work environment of Dr. Lewis Fielding. Fielding was looking for information to be used in the reconnaissance fundamental against the advisor of Daniel Ellsberg, the Rand Corporation master. He had delivered to the  New York Times. Early 1971, Attorney General John N. Mitchell and John Dean, guidance to the president, addressed to look at the issue to get political information for the Committee for the Re-Election of the President. In 1972 Mitchell gave up as legal counselor as general to recognize the circumstance as supervisor of the leading body of legal administrators. As of now, a plan was upheld to break into the DNC headquarters to get campaign technique reports and other materials. The nominee top of the board, Jeb Magruder, later confirmed that Mitchell had upheld a course of action made by G. Gordon Liddy, the primary jack of all trades, to break into the Watergate complex. Mitchell denied this. It has never become clear who mentioned the action without a doubt the double-crossers needed to find.As of June 17, 1972, five men were caught at the DNC headquarters, including the board’s security coordinator, James McCord. The crooks were changing observation gear they had presented in May when seen in. Immediately a camouflage began.Magruder demolished records and gave a false presentation to subject matter experts. The White House frustrated an FBI demand, reporting that it was a public security movement embraced by the CIA.Mitchell left his post on July 1, 1972, referring to personal reasons. From the first assessment, simply the five crooks, notwithstanding Liddy and E. Howard Hunt was arraigned. In January, all seven were condemned, but the covering was beginning to loosen up. In March 1973, U.S. AreaCourt judge John Sirica got a letter from McCord charging that witnesses had submitted a lie at the primer. Nevertheless, he continued to trap Dean and Magruder. Senior part and Magruder broke under tending to and offered affirmation that trapped White House and Nixon campaign specialists. The old part attested that Mitchell had upheld the break-in with the data on White House local expert John Ehrlichman and head of staff H. R. Haldeman.As of May 1973, Senator Sam Ervin (D-N.C.) opened an excellent Senate board assessment concerning the undertaking. During this time, Attorney General Elliot L. Richardson assigned Archibald Cox, Jr., as an uncommon agent to investigate the entire issue. After a short time, Cox uncovered unfathomable confirmation of political surveillance, unlawful wiretaps, and effective selling. In July 1973, it was uncovered that Nixon had secretively recorded conversations in the White House starting around 1971. Cox sued to get the tapes. On October 20, 1973, Nixon mentioned Richardson to fire the special inspector. Richardsondeclined and gave up; his colleague, William Ruckelshaus, dismissed and was ended. Finally, Solicitor General Robert Bork ended Cox. became known  in American history as the  “Saturday Night Massacre.” It incitedrequires Nixon’s reprimand, and the House of Representatives began an indictment assessment. Following Nixon’s ending of Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox in April 1974, Nixon assigned a new remarkable analyst, Leon Jaworski. After tolerating office, Jaworski called the 64 tapes required for the convictions coming about because of the arraignments. Nixon would not agree to the bring and proposed a compromise wherein he proposed to give changed records rather than the original tapes. Unfortunately, all the documents contained embarrassing material, including a colossal number of truly deleted swearwords; they were furthermore erroneous and inadequate. The mistakes were uncovered when the House Judiciary Committee convened its transformation of the tapes. U.S. Area Court judge John Sirica, who had given the first gather, excused the records as unacceptable and reissued a solicitation for the principal tapes. James St. Clair, the head of Nixon’s Watergate monitor bunch, sought Sirica’s choice to the Court of Appeals. Jaworski, wishing to accelerate the collaboration, sought after directly to the Supreme Court. The judge agreed to hear the case, United States v. Nixon, on July 8, 1974.Nixon’s case laid on two issues. First, in any case, the association examined the lawful leader’s domain in bringing the tapes, referring to the parcel of capacities. Second, the association referred to pioneerhonor, the necessity for the security of correspondence between high government specialists and their advisors. The Court aggregately excused the two cases in a choice on July 24, 1974. On theessential point, the Court referred to Marbury v. Madison (1803), which affirmed the power of lawful review. Regarding the resulting matter, Chief Justice Warren Burger fought that neither parcel offorces nor the prerequisite for characterized correspondence considered significant authority honor of safety from the legitimate connection.On August 5, 1974, the records were conveyed, including one particularly hurting to Nixon, in which he discussed using the CIA to deter the FBI assessment of the Watergate break-in.These tapes incited the arraignments of Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell, Charles Colson, Robert Mardian, and Kenneth Parkinson for plotting to disguise the Watergate shame. Colson admitted to charges starting from the Fielding split in, and the disguise charges weredropped. Haldeman, Ehrlichman, and Mitchell were viewed as accountable in the long run. Defying an official choice on arraignment, Nixon revealed his quiet submission on the evening ofAugust 8, 1974, to be fruitful the next day around early evening. The purpose of the break-in was trying to wiretap Larry O’Brien, who was the democratic national committee chairman, to see how he made his money. Along with seeing if he had any connection with Cuba or Castro. The break-in was felt justified by Gordon Liddy, who was a previous FBI  agent, because they could and why not. Although Nixon was not charged, he only resigned where Gerald Ford became the next president. I find the “Deep Throat” section attractive due to Mark Felt, the puzzling government whistleblower who assisted Washington Post journalists Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward with unwinding the Watergate scheme. Mark Felt exposed his individual in 2005. A senior FBI professional for the Watergate years, Mark Felt occasionally met with Woodward-always in deserted parking lots. He constantly avoided capability hazards to guarantee they had no longer been followed-giving signs and symptoms that directed the author’s saying. He once advised Woodward that the Nixon White House was “devious and mysterious,” he once advised Woodward. Had President Nixon destroyed the 64 tapes, he would have been able to get away with it. Eventually would have blown over and would have never been the biggest scandal in U.S history. This later proved Americans could not believe everything government officials had said to be true, although it had drastically dropped. Eventually, Americans bounced back into trusting the government until the Clinton Scandal, where it dropped to 24%; for the Americans to begin trusting government officials, they need to be honest and have a better economy. We only seem to trust the government when our economy is in good standing. Word Count: 1301 | Similarity Score ( 48%) their sources www.wscschools.org/cms/lib/NY02205793/Centricity/Domain/1235/Nixon%20Readings.pdfment officials and reporters in an attempt to discern the source of news leaks about activities in Vietnam. In 1971 a special investigations unit was formed to plug news leaks. Dubbed the “plumbers,” they broke into the office of Dr. Lewis Fielding looking for information to be used in the espionage trial against the psychiatrist of Daniel Ellsberg, the Rand Corporation analyst who had leaked the Pentagon Papers to the New York Times. Also in 1971, Attorney General John N. Mitchell and John Dean, counsel to the president, met to discuss the need to obtain political intelligence forwww.wscschools.org/cms/lib/NY02205793/Centricity/Domain/1235/Nixon%20Readings.pdfnt, Chief Justice Warren Burger argued that neither separation of powers nor the need for confidential communication allowed for absolute presidential privilege of immunity from the judicial process. On August 5, 1974, the transcripts were released, including one particularly damaging to Nixon, in which he discussed using the CIA to obstruct the FBI investigation of the Watergate break-in. These tapes led to the indictments of Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell, Charles Colson, Robert Mardian, and Kenneth Parkinson for conspiring to cover up the Watergate scandal. Colson pleaded guilty to charges stemming from the Fielding break-in and the cover-up charges were dropped. Ultimately, Haldeman, Ehrlichman, and Mitchell were found guilty. Facing a congressional vote on impeachment, Nixon announced his resignation on the evening of August 8, 1974, to be effective the next day at noon. Information taken from: Korasick, JohBegin original source.nt, Chief Justice Warren Burger argued that neither separation of powers nor the need for confidential communication allowed for absolute presidential privilege of immunity from the judicial process.Begin similarity match.On August 5, 1974, thePause similarity match.transcriptsResume similarity match.werePause similarity match.released,Resume similarity match.including one particularlyPause similarity match.damagingResume similarity match.to Nixon, in which he discussed using the CIA toPause similarity match.obstructResume similarity match.the FBIPause similarity match.investigationResume similarity match.of the Watergate break-in. These tapesPause similarity match.led toResume similarity match.thePause similarity match.indictmentsResume similarity match.of Haldeman, Ehrlichman, Mitchell, Charles Colson, Robert Mardian, and Kenneth Parkinson forPause similarity match.conspiringResume similarity match.toPause similarity match.cover upResume similarity match.the WatergatePause similarity match.scandal.Resume similarity match.ColsonPause similarity match.pleaded guiltyResume similarity match.to chargesPause similarity match.stemmingResume similarity match.from the FieldingPause similarity match.break-Resume similarity match.in and thePause similarity match.cover-upResume similarity match.charges were droppedPause similarity match.. Ultimately,Resume similarity match.Haldeman, Ehrlichman, and Mitchell wereEnd similarity match.found guilty. Facing a congressional vote on impeachment, Nixon announced his resignation on the evening of August 8, 1974, to be effective the next day at noon. Information taken from: Korasick, JohEnd original source. View Full Text    History US History HIST 2105A17 Share QuestionEmailCopy link Comments (0)

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 6-12 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

If yes Order Similar Paper