I have 2 of my classmates posts about their Annotated Bibliograph. I need you to respond to each one separately. Also, two sources at least for each one of them. Don’t write about how good their posts or how bad. All you need to do is to choose one point of the post and explore it a little bit with one source support for each response. The paper should be APA style.
– pleas use proper APA7th references format and in-line citation.
– Minimum words for every respond 300
-Minimum refernces 2
All the details in the attached below
Mary Colleen Bhalla, M., Amos Burgess, M., Jennifer Frey, P., & William Hardy, B. M. (2015). Geriatric Disaster Preparedness. Geriatric Disaster Preparedness, 443-446. doi:10.1017/S1049023X15005075
This peer-review journal focuses on a study into how many elderly people are usually prepared during times of disaster and who are ready for disaster strikes in the future. The authors found out that the elderly population was very vulnerable in times of disaster. Several of them were found to have a chronic medical problem that warranted them to need medical facility assistance and medication. Some older people were even found to be more dependent on caregivers to manage their day to day activities.
The authors’ thesis was that many elderly people were not prepared for disaster strikes and therefore assessed the potential plans and needs for the elder population in times of local disaster. The research was to be carried extensively to people of sixty-five to ninety-four years. Thirteen visitors to the emergency department and eighty-seven patients were interviewed for the research. This age bracket interview made all the findings credible.
The authors are board-certified emergency medicine physicians which makes them very qualified to perform medical research work on patients. Their level of academic prowess in the medical field makes them fit to conduct research and provide their findings as credible.
This peer-review journal will be beneficial to the elderly population, caregivers and medical practitioners. This is because it will help them prepare the elderly or themselves for future calamities and help them understand the importance of geriatric disaster preparedness.
Gil-Rivas, V., & Kilmer, R. P. (2016). Building community capacity and fostering disaster resilience. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(12), 1318-1332.
The article focuses on community capacity building and improving community resilience towards disasters. Disasters are unforeseen, and it may difficult for people to stop the occurrence of disasters. However, the community can lessen the impact of disasters. The article will support my topic, and it provides more insights on how to improve the resilience of the communities towards disasters. This article is important because of the following reason. First, the article presents the current information. The article was published in 2016 by the journal of clinical psychology. Although the information has not been revisited or updated, it provides accurate and reliable information. My topic relies on current and factual information. The article only needs to discuss the methods that can be used to improve community resilience towards the ever-occurring disasters. Lastly, the link to this article is working.
Secondly, the article presents the relevant information. The information relates to my topic. The article presents strategies that can be used to improve community resilience to cascading disasters. It targets the community members and the policymakers on how they can enhance the resilience of the communities after the occurrence of disasters. Indeed, a variety of resources were looked at before determining this article.
Thirdly, the article is authored by Virginia Gil-Rivas and Ryan P. Kilmer. Both Virginia Gil-Rivas and Ryan P. Kilmer are the professors of Psychology at the University of North Carolina. They are researchers and prolific writers and have ample background on the community disaster preparedness. They are qualified to write articles on the community resilience subject. The information, such as the publisher’s physical and email addresses, is presented. The URL reveals that the article is retrieved from Wiley Online Library.
Lastly, it presents reliable, correct, truthful content. It is reliable because the authors have cited their work and included the references. Furthermore, the article does not express the bias information or authors’ opinions, and the grammar is fully famished. Therefore, the information is valid and accurate. The information presented in the article is the fact as it is verifiable.