Consider the case of Franz, philosophy discussion help

This discussion need 200 words.no reference no plagiarism.One putative example of irrationality is maintaining a belief in light of the knowledge that the belief is false.

Consider the case of Franz. Franz believes x and then later is presented with a convincing case demonstrating that x is in fact false. Franz understands the case completely and concedes that it does in fact prove that x is false. If Franz persisted in his believe in x, would he be guilty of irrational behavior?

More generally, is it always irrational to hold/maintain beliefs that are or are likely to be false? If so, why? In either case, please discuss an example (real or fictitious) or two that illustrates your position.

Needs help with similar assignment?

We are available 24x7 to deliver the best services and assignment ready within 6-12 hours? Order a custom-written, plagiarism-free paper

Order Over WhatsApp Place an Order Online

Do you have an upcoming essay or assignment due?

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

If yes Order Similar Paper